[SamAdams76]

Mentioned in the article is that Bernie Sanders most likely won the popular vote in Iowa but it is reported instead that Shrillary won by 700-696 "SDEs" - whatever the hell that means. But some of those were won on "coin tosses" so who know who even won the SDE's.

In any case, it looks like Shrillary is headed for a decisive defeat in NH and while many here figure Bernie has no legs after NH and that it will be a Shrillary cakewalk after that, think again. Bernie is rapidly building a grassroots coalition across the country and as incredible as it seems, he is in decent shape to win the nomination.

Think about how destructive the Clintons have been to this country. Not only did we get 8 years of Bill Clinton, but in exchange for Shrillary to cover for him on the bimbo scandals, we had her foisted upon us as the selected nominee of 2008, resulting in two terms of Barack Obama. Now history is about to repeat itself with an out-and-out socialist like Bernie Sanders. All because the Democrat Party feels that Shrillary must get her turn at all costs.

[righttackle44]

Mentioned in the article is that Bernie Sanders most likely won the popular vote in Iowa but it is reported instead that Shrillary won by 700-696 "SDEs . . . "

She won by sexually transmitted disease? -

[StAnDeliver]

"All because the Democrat Party feels that Shrillary must get her turn at all costs."

Because if she doesn't, they don't eat. That's what this election is all about - forcing as many of the entrenched Democrat Party mandarins off the Federal teat.