Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

Wrong. You fit people to the job that needs to be done. A woman is ill suited for battle conditions so it would be folly to place them in that job.

People have to be qualified for their position. You wouldn’t hire someone to be a typist who can’t type. I suppose for your argument that IF a woman demands to be put into a fighting unit because she wants equality, you may have a point but she still needs to be qualified. I seriously doubt that, if the standards are maintained, she would be qualified.


124 posted on 02/07/2016 4:21:17 PM PST by upsdriver (I support Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: upsdriver; VanDeKoik

No dude you are wrong. A draft would assure statistically that equal numbers of men and women are selected. Actually more women would be drafted than men because women outnumber men

I assume you were in one of the services but it doesn’t matter either way unless you make statements like “ the Army is the Army”.

So now you have more than half of the draftees who have to be trained and assigned somewhere right?

Now that you’ve wasted all that money and time training people who can not fight what do you do with them?

There are not enough rear echelon mos’s or support units to hide soldiers who can not and should not fight.

Thoughts on that?


137 posted on 02/07/2016 5:01:35 PM PST by jwalsh07 (On)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson