Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
>> Maybe the fact that he's a United States Senator, rather than governor of Vermont. <<



I understand, but he worked his way up through the political ranks in Vermont so I would assume he has a lot of influence in state politics. Since his constituents support his policies, I think socialism would be easy to implement in a small state.

My point is that leftists must always do things on a grand scale. For example, single payer health care was a failure in Vermont (see below) but the only thing leftists learned is they need a bigger pocket to pick.

BTW - In short, if a liberal state electing a Socialist (US Senator Bernie Sanders) to Congress can't or won't put a single payer system into place, then who will?

Costs derail Vermont's dream of a single-payer health plan
52 posted on 02/07/2016 9:04:15 AM PST by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Kid Shelleen

I understand now, and I agree.


55 posted on 02/07/2016 11:46:23 AM PST by Tax-chick ("We have no values in common with Saudi Arabia."~ Daniel Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson