Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie; Georgia Girl 2; JennysCool; All

One of the things that “well regulated militias” do is store more dangerous implements of war in armories for distribution to the trained citizens who belong to the militia in case of emergency. The tricky part is defining what is a more dangerous implement of war

On a separate note, now that women have been judged eligible for every branch and twig of the armed services, there is now talk of requiring national registration of women as well as men. Any thoughts on that issue?


42 posted on 02/06/2016 9:40:04 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin; All

It is wicked and mean-spirited and against the very order of nature as God set it up to register women in the anticipation of compulsory military service in defense or offense of a country. It will bring additional judgments on our land. It is a pox and a black spot in the history of our country to even consider a thing.

By the way, would any liberal women reading this please stop staring at me like I’m hurting you when I hold the door for you?


45 posted on 02/06/2016 9:50:03 AM PST by refreshed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

“there is now talk of requiring national registration of women as well as men.”

That’s all it is, talk.


46 posted on 02/06/2016 9:51:43 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin
One of the things that "well regulated militias" do is store more dangerous implements of war in armories for distribution to the trained citizens who belong to the militia in case of emergency. The tricky part is defining what is a more dangerous implement of war.

No disagreement there. Managing such considerations is what Federalism was for.

On a separate note, now that women have been judged eligible for every branch and twig of the armed services, there is now talk of requiring national registration of women as well as men. Any thoughts on that issue?

Women are every bit as capable of running a drone as men. While in combat, they are probably also as capable of running a tank or driving a truck, problems do arise with their mere presence in a unit. So the hazards arise at the edges where the two interact, because sex is as powerful a drive as national defense, particularly when our historic dominance has become acculturated while sexuality in child rearing has become nothing less than obsessive.

Let's face it, if this was about defense of home and hearth, you can bet there are women capable of emotionally if not physically. On the other hand, we do allow male soldiers to become obese, and they aren't worth a crap on the ground either. While we do have motivated soldiers, frankly, I think our whole k-12 educational standard built around positive reinforcement is problematic when it comes to making disciplined soldiers. Still, they can't all be SEALS, but then we don't need that. So in a sense, I think that experimentation is in order, to which the State militia model is appropriate.

So if I were king, I'd do what I could to strengthen AND integrate nationally the National Guard model, to build that regionally diversified command structure and run those experiments.

Thanks for asking. I hadn't really thought about it much.

72 posted on 02/06/2016 10:46:05 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson