There’s no need to amend what is already perfectly clear.
In your subjective interpretation. Subjective interpretation in law is tyrannical.
You misunderstood what I originally said. If you think I am discounting the unorganized militia, you are hugely mistaken. I am saying that they need more practice, organization, and logistical support to counter the police state. For example, the unorganized militia is perfectly suited to rid the country of illegals and terrorists pursuant to a Congressional letter of marque, but they do need to understand more about how to make a legal arrest; i.e., they need to be more "regular."
Got it now?