I strongly disagree, as familiarity with language control leads to statism. "Regulated" being the word in question, it's meaning at the time of the amendment was well armed.
That was the meaning of the word as used in the legal language of the day, an originalist's application. The use was similar to the term, "British Regulars" and "regulate commerce" which at the time meant to facilitate it to be "regular."
If you don't like it, amend it.