Not clear on what you mean.... I was acknowledging the truth of a statement by a Cruz supporter. Then my intent was that the best way not to “get caught” is not to do it in the first place. I will not view Cruz nor Trump in the negative on past actions if they are no longer done. I do believe that through God everyone is capable of changes for the better.
Unlike some I don’t hold 20 year old opinions against Trump. He says differently now. I will no longer hold Cruz in negative light for Corker or TPA if he ceases to vote in that fashion or play on the edge in campaigning.
I guess my point was to vent frustration with Cruz for getting caught up in the whole tweet flap. Shouldn’t happen. He should stand for something more than just being about winning. Me? I’m firing whoever did it. Was it a whole lot of people? Then I’m firing a whole lot of people. Was it my top guy (Steve King)? Then, my top guy just dragged me into something that he should have known was going to be turned into something that would dominate the news and get our campaign off task for a while—and I’m firing him!
Some of his supporters say they are okay with these tactics. That may well be, but it is not them that Cruz needs to convince, is it? Many here have laced their posts with accusations of blind obedience/messiah worship on the part of others. Turning a blind eye to negatives doesn’t make negatives go away, it makes you look blind. Can’t have that in the next president. And his supporters cannot allow him to get away with such blindness, either. Blindness (to the Constitution) has already gotten us pretty far down the hole we’re in.