Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarDav

I thought I was stating something fairly obvious. Yes, it would be nice if the Cruz campaign said so much in so many words, but it should not take Sherlock or a shrink to figure out how that could happen when there was an absence of malicious or nefarious intent. There are those who will continue to attack Cruz over this because they wanted another candidate anyway. The GOPe crew will be happy to belabor the incident in the worst possible light.


24 posted on 02/06/2016 5:01:23 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

I didn’t know that your initial comment was the actual explanation given out by the Cruz campaign (especially the part about ceasing to follow the original CNN story). That would make a bit of difference, I suppose, though I haven’t heard much air time given to this.

I don’t know...the whole thing is, to me, a bit of a let-down with Ted. I expected more. I don’t want to hear the Christian constitutional conservative as much as I want to SEE him. The two flaps (the Carson tweets and the voting mailer) simply leaves me wanting more.


29 posted on 02/06/2016 5:09:02 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson