[xzins]

Personally, ‘take care’ is not to be taken by itself. It goes on to say “to faithfully execute”.

“Take Care” without “faithfully” means nothing.

Here the Scotus has focused, so they say, on ‘take care’.

I’ve no doubt we’ll have logical handsprings that would embarrass even the sophists before this is over. They end up saying it’s in the mind of the beholder, and Obama is the relevant beholder.

[rbg81]

Obama is not worried. He will just roll-out whatever blackjack he has on Chief Justice Roberts again. Kind of like a legal version of “Dance Rummy....dance!”.

[CA Conservative]

You might be over thinking this. They talk about the "Take Care" clause, but the entire clause includes the "faithfully execute" phrase - indeed, without that phrase it would be impossible to know what the President was to take care to do. The fact that the Court added this sua sponte is very significant. I think we may see Obama get slapped down on more than just his illegal amnesty, but on many of his EOs in general.