then you were a lone voice.
on that same note, you cannot possibly convince yourself or others that Trump is not a full blown liberal, spouting conservative principals while its convenient to him, but not having an ounce of conviction.
Whiskey....just this week he was pitching nationalized healthcare!!! Come on dude.
“then you were a lone voice.”
No, I was not a lone voice. We were simply drowned out by the mob, same as now, especially after Hillary Clinton and the usual suspects came out and officially opposed the nomination.
“on that same note, you cannot possibly convince yourself or others that Trump is not a full blown liberal, spouting conservative principals while its convenient to him, but not having an ounce of conviction.”
You Cruz and Rubio supporters are so blinded by ambitions that you simply refuse to understand that opposition to your favorite new saint does not equate to an approval or endorsement of another candidate.
“Whiskey....just this week he was pitching nationalized healthcare!!! Come on dude.”
For the record, he did not do so; you are making an inaccurate accusation. Trump observed the common sense fact that the public health and welfare requires some means of taking care of people who are unable to care of themselves. The United States has been doing that since the beginning of the Republic by one means or another since 1776. They used to have institutions such as the county poorhouses and other methods in past history. At the most you can say Trump is promising to promote some form of social welfare medicine that can be controversial to conservatives. Just don’t go around inventing falsehoods to exaggerate falsely. It does not benefit the debate to waste time and create unnecessary divisions amongst ourselves with disinformation. Trump has plenty of genuine failings to criticize without making up false ones. Now go ahead and pursue Trump with real and valid criticisms that advance the debate, I’m not a supporter for him or any other candidate, so you’re not going to hurt my feelings.