Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk

How many babies did Trump kill?

How many babies have our representatives have killed because they are afraid to make King Obama sad?

Think about it


115 posted on 02/04/2016 4:13:46 PM PST by arl295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: arl295

Trump claims he can’t recall if he donated to PP. Sure he can’t. If he did then he is responsible for the killing of babies.


119 posted on 02/04/2016 4:22:32 PM PST by beandog (TrumperTantrum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: arl295
Trump, until he took a few polls prior to seeking the GOP POTUS nomination, was always a pro-abort. In an interview with Chuck Todd on NBC in 1999, he claimed to be as "pro-choice" (read pro-abort because no woman ever needed permission to give birth) as anyone in this country. That put him right up there with Planned Barrenhood, every abortion mill in the land, the Arkansas Medusa, Billy Jeff, Obozo, etc.

BUT it would hardly do to run for POTUS as a pro-abort in the GOP. That would be a candidacy facing certain and swift death. So, The Donald needed a conversion story on the subject. Something almost vaguely credible. Something the social conservative peasants might buy: He held a friend's baby in his lap: a REALLY amazing baby! Suddenly, he realized that THIS child deserved to LIVE! He was coverted o the subject! Never mind his lavish contributions to buy influence with every Demonrat pro-abort politician in the land! NO, NO, NOTHING to see here. Trump is now a pro-lifer because, well, he says so! What reason would he have to lie???

I don't get the bit aobut how our quisling sell out politicians may have killed babies by not being willing to make Obozo sad. Are Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Paul Ryan-o and their ilk neglecting their obligations to save the babies? Of course, business (and I do mean business) as usual.

Trump needed to run for POTUS to even pay lip service, however phony, to the lives of the babies.

If you want to tell me that Reagan signed a permissive abortion law in California and later changed HIS mind, I will tell you that he changed his mind within the first year when he saw the humongous number of "legal" abortions that resulted. He began immediately, as governor, going door to door circulating initiative petitions to repeal that law by popular vote. As POTUS, he was an ever faithful pro-lifer, an obvious practicing Christian, wrote and published a pro-life book and addressed the annual March for Life by telephone hookup most years. This appeared to stick in Nancy's craw but, love her though he did, he plunged ahead and never wavered.

Ted Cruz is a steadfast pro-lifer. So is Marco Rubio. I believe that Kasich and Christie are as well. Jeb Bush was solid on the babies as governor. Dr. Carson is a solid pro-lifer and did not shrink from embarrassing Obozo at a National Prayer Breakfast by addressing the subject to Obozo's face. I would support some and oppose some for various reasons but Trump is giving me nothing on the subject.

124 posted on 02/04/2016 9:14:57 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson