I see I am getting under your skin. One of life’s small pleasures.
A notion is a belief, a fact not so much. I am surprised that you are having trouble with that. All the ad hominem in the universe isn’t going to change that.
I take it by your outrage that you did not support Trumps slandering of the good Dr. I’ll take you at your word on that. But it does lead to an obvious question. Was Trumps slandering of Dr. Carson as a psychopath admirable politics while the Cruz campaigns repeating a news report an immoral act worthy of shunning?
Your voter fraud assertion is simply asinine. Repeating or disseminating press reports is covered by the First Amendment S is Trumps slanderous speech regarding Carson.
Good luck in NH!
I'm having no trouble at all with the meaning of the word notion. It's you who used the word in an entirely inappropriate manner in what was, as I said, the dumbest statement I've ever read on FR. It's also the most unsupported and unsupportable statement:
The notion that even one voter changed their vote because of this is ridiculous.
As I said before, there were 1,681 venue sites during the Iowa caucuses. So, you claim that based on your "notion", that "not even one vote" was changed in any of the 1,681 caucus venues. Utter nonsense to even make such a statement.
One can have a "notion" that the Cruz fraud had no impact on the overall result. But a "notion" that the fraud did not change one single vote in any of the 1,681 venues is not a notion, but the babbling of Cruz supporter who refuses to deal with the reality of what happened.
But you seem to have a real knack for this "notion" business. I suggest you go into the Psychic Hotline business. You have a talent. Heck, maybe you can even pick lottery winners based on your notions if you can divine what did and and didn't happen at 1,681 caucus venues. The notion that even one voter changed their vote because of this is ridiculous.