Numerous national media outlets are pursuing multiple allegations of infidelity involving U.S. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida – all in the aftermath of the “mistress bomb†report we published earlier this week.
Specifically, three mainstream media outlets have independently supplied us with the names of two additional women said to be romantically linked to the GOP establishment’s candidate of choice. These names are in addition to the woman we referenced earlier this week – a lobbyist whose alleged proximity to Rubio was discovered during a deep dive into the candidate’s disastrous personal finances.
Meanwhile, a national operative familiar with the opposition research on Rubio described his extramarital dalliances as “serial.â€
“He is going down,†the operative told us point blank. I’ll have more to reveal on Rubio as we get closer to the material being relevant. Why publish now? It’s not like he’s rising in the polls. Why not wait until the debates or until the January caucus? Let’s be clear here: I have the names of the women, I have the addresses, and I have the evidence. It is a little funny that people who can’t do the work always seem to say it can’t be done. But seriously why not wait until all the Establishment people come out in favor of Rubio so that it’s that much easier to screen would be candidates in a Cruz administration?
Slimy tactic there and pointless in the big picture.
Those who have realized that the GOPe is going to do whatever they must do to get their guy in, whether it be Jeb or Rubio, (they WILL get it done because we are too weak to put our own self righteous thoughts of being smarter than the next guy, and constantly falling for the same tactics of division), are the intelligent ones who know how to beat this game.
There are easy to spot and make the most sense without the blustery nonsense that frankly, this country does not have time for. barry at a mosque today, THAT tells me how little time we have left.
That's concerned me, too. The infedility rumors that can explode at just the right time like Edwards, doesn't have to be a baby involved. Also his not voting and running around fund raising. I hate it when the Dems do that, raise money on company time.
Also putting personal stuff on his Party charge card does not sit well with me. I just don't like him.
When I watched Obama getting the crowds so excited, I wondered why couldn't we get somebody like that? Well we have one now, Trump, which is a thrill (I don't get excited like that over people even if I like them). But as others have said, his negative traits I don't know if I could violate my conscience to vote for him. He said so many right things I've been waiting to hear from somebody. I think he would do his best to come through if he could. Like somebody said, he would put Schumer, Feinstein, and Pelosi in their places, we can hope. Maybe he's been friends with them, too.
Cruz is so unliked, worse than Hillary, that I don't see how he can win. I did like him when he put it on the line to filibuster and especially when he called what's his name a liar.
That leaves nobody else because I'm tired of them all, wouldn't vote for one of the ones left.
Trump or Cruz. I don't even care if Trump isn't a bona fide conservative any more although I do worry a little if he would play fast and loose with the constitution. Abortion, let him keep it to himself. Nothing is going to be done about it. I just can never vote for a Dem because it's a party plank.
Jim Webb with that Hawaiian congresswoman, she wowed me. But they are pro-abort Dems so I couldn't go there even if it were possible.