Replies

Reagan supported a one-time amnesty after which the border problems were supposed to be solved by Congress. It was a deal with the ~~Devil~~ Democrats. To suggest he was in any way in favor of illegal immigration is a misreading of history. Reagan had core principles and stuck to them.

Marco Rubio, on the other hand, has been a disappointment to the TEA Party ever since he arrived in DC and supported the Establishment over TEA Party patriots. He has shown situational principles and no solid core.

No Rubio. No way.

17 posted on 02/03/2016 8:19:29 AM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)

No Rubio. No way.

If he ends up being the nominee, who do you vote for? Do we concede the election to Clinton and endure another four (or eight) years of the ongoing destruction of this nation? How about two or three more Kagans on the Supreme Court for the next thirty years? Rubio's bad, but the alternative is infinitely worse.