Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tlozo

It’s embarrassing to see conservatives twisting themselves into pretzels defending the use of eminent domain for a limousine parking lot.
___________________

The facts have been misrepresented. The use of a parking lot was going to be temporary. The future use was to build another hotel tower and this boarding house was one part of an ASSEMBLAGE. In fact, one element of the court’s basis for striking down the Eminent Domain had to do with the fact that the property would not be put to the proper public use immediately which was a new hotel tower, so it ruled against the Casino Development Company on the temporary use.

The case is worth reading.

As most things...there is a lot more to the story.


138 posted on 02/03/2016 9:31:26 AM PST by GeaugaRepublican (Angry yes, mad, no. GOPe for Rubio - Kill Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: GeaugaRepublican

It would seem that even for Kelo like situations there should be a “use it or lose it” principle in effect. Otherwise waste is invited.


139 posted on 02/03/2016 9:34:01 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson