Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

No it is NOT an issue for SCOTUS.

The Constitution specifically enumerates Congress with the authority to set the rules of naturalization. That includes who does and does not need to be naturalized.


15 posted on 02/02/2016 4:43:59 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

My understanding as well


79 posted on 02/02/2016 5:14:34 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

As Benjamin Franklin said “A republic, madam, if you can keep it”. I am watching as the answer is revealed.

Apparently we will morph to the United States of the World.


157 posted on 02/02/2016 5:57:52 PM PST by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
That includes who does and does not need to be naturalized.

Non sequitur.

307 posted on 02/02/2016 7:39:32 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
The Constitution specifically enumerates Congress with the authority to set the rules of naturalization. That includes who does and does not need to be naturalized.

Does this mean the Constitution gives Congress power to pass a law requiring that absolutely everyone has to be naturalized?

367 posted on 02/02/2016 9:48:53 PM PST by Joachim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson