Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hillarys cankles

You keep on repeating that The Donald had no ground game in Iowa as though that were a virtue. Do we want a nominee who spends all of his time being a blowhard and NOT creating a ground game. Ted Cruz did the hard work that wins in Iowa. Last night The Donald made a very gracious concession speech. Neither Cruz nor Trump is a flunkie for the GOP-E. On to New Hampshire, South Carolina and beyond! May the best man win. May both of them compete with detailed plans and commitments as to how they will put an end to the mess we are in. Let there be great ground games for both of them since that becomes the basis for a ground game in the general election. Let the guttersniping end on BOTH sides of this dichotomy, remembering always that the purpose of this exercise is the restoration and advancement of this republic and our liberties.


162 posted on 02/02/2016 1:20:47 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

Trump should have ignored Iowa. But he wanted to test his political skills. And he is locked in the threesome as a leader. Unless it’s all you have, you don’t spend 2 years slugging it out for a handful of delegates that aren’t even committed to you anyhow. IA is a nothing burger.


166 posted on 02/02/2016 1:23:56 PM PST by Lagmeister ( false prophets shall rise, and shall show signs and wonders Mark 13:22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson