Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

” . . . Rubio will be a different and more challenging target, compared with Cruz. . . . “

I heard someone say that Trump hasn’t begun to go after Rubio - just wait.

Isnt his situation even more clear than Cruz - not NBC. Someone said Rubio parents were NOT citizens when he was born.


228 posted on 02/02/2016 2:44:23 PM PST by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: PraiseTheLord
They weren't; he's an ANCHOR BABY!

And he's also a McLame and shumcky Chuckie Schumer's sock puppet.

230 posted on 02/02/2016 2:46:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: PraiseTheLord

“Someone said Rubio parents were NOT citizens when he was born.”

I believe that’s true. Even more disturbing is their connection to Cuba. IIRC, for years while campaigning Rubio said/implied they were running from the Castro regime. Truth was, they left Cuba before Castro. There are many disturbing untruths that he’s put out there, and then, when caught, revises.


432 posted on 02/02/2016 4:25:00 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Proud bitter clinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: PraiseTheLord
-- Isnt his situation even more clear than Cruz - not NBC. Someone said Rubio parents were NOT citizens when he was born. --

The case law on persons born-abroad is very clear, completely consistent, and says that all citizens born abroad are naturalized citizens.

The case law on citizenship of persons born in the US superficially leads to the conclusion that they are qualified for the presidency.

Rubio's parents were Cuban citizens who, at the time he was born, intended to return to Cuba. Rubio was born a dual citizen, and while the case law isn't as clear as it is for persons born abraod, the case law strongly suggests that a person born a dual citizen is not qualified for the presidency. Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952)

433 posted on 02/02/2016 4:25:12 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson