Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fiji Hill

I thought the article was about a plane, not a campaign. Ted Cruz’s bio reads like Obama’s, from the Harvard graduation forward, they could be political twins, both claiming to be constitutional scholars, yet both lack serious constitutional understanding.

As far as the campaign goes, what does it matter that Trump takes “unsolicited” donations? What matters is the unlike Cruz, Trump’s campaign does not rely on the donations, it uses the donations to reimburse Trump for the personal money he has already loaned to the campaign.

All I had to do was take a look at the “big” players cruz has solicited money from and then go and look at his voting record I the US Senate as well as his history as a lawyer and litigator, and it reads like a well oiled pay to play political machine, down to Cruz’s vote giving legal amnesty to big pharma & big chemical companies, that no matter how many people they kill with their poisons, NONE of them can be held liable in a court of law because it was written into a law that Cruz supported and voted for, the Monsanto/big pharma protection act. Yeah right, Cruz against Iowa ethanol? Can you say “smoke screen”? Yep, there are sure a lot of gullible voters out.


39 posted on 02/02/2016 12:52:31 AM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: patlin

Not just “gullible”, but very stupid as well; sadly.


47 posted on 02/02/2016 1:03:23 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson