It’s actually more about disgust for Sarah Palin and others who are willing to dismiss and disregard virtually everything that Trump once stood for and, in many cases, still stands for and taking every single word that comes out of Trump’s mouth as if it came from a burning bush.
It’s also about vilifying Ted Cruz because his wife works for Goldman Sachs, because he took out a loan from Goldman (against his own investment account), but disregarding the fact that Trump has not only taken out multiple loans from Goldman, but owns Goldman stock and that he has taken out loans from virtually every other NY-based international investment bank.
It’s about stupid Trump comments like “Ted Cruz was a Canadian anchor baby” when Trump knows (or should know) that, using his originalist definition of natural born, an American Indian will never be eligible to run for the presidency.
And it’s about a “win at all costs” attitude, no matter what the long-term ramifications might be - even if it involves destroying a good man who is vilified by the establishment of both parties and has a very strong, anti-GOP establishment conservative record in the process.
Its also about vilifying Ted Cruz because his wife works for Goldman Sachs, because he took out a loan from Goldman (against his own investment account),
...
Its because he did not declare the first loan, required by law, and did not even mention the second one. Whereas Trump listed ALL his.
...
“Ted Cruz was a Canadian anchor baby†when Trump knows (or should know) that, using his originalist definition of natural born, an American Indian will never be eligible to run for the presidency.
...
Ted Cruz father was Cuban, he was born in the US...that is a definition of “anchor baby”.
As I described in detail previously. No second generation indian born to Naturalized parents is not Natural born.
Your arguments are specious IMO.