Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video: Hillary Clinton is finally confronted with her classified data non-disclosure agreement
Hot Air.com ^ | January 31, 2016 | JAZZ SHAW

Posted on 01/31/2016 3:55:51 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Kaslin
"You know, you can't get information off the classified system in the State Department to put on an unclassified system, no matter what that system is."

How did you possibly do your job as SecState then, Mrs. Satan's Wife, since it is now a matter of public record that you never got a State Dept. account or computer and the only one you had was your unclassified homemade server?

41 posted on 01/31/2016 8:19:04 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

How can she possibly claim to be ignorant of that since the only system she had was her home server? Especially with this signed classified data non-disclosure agreement?


42 posted on 01/31/2016 8:23:00 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn
As a former US Naval Communicator/Cryptographer, I have to side with Mz C on this one.

LOL. This is the 21st century. Side with Mz C? Do you understand the issue and the problem?

FYI: Only the originator can change the classification. If NSA sent a Top Secret message, the recipient can't change it to unclassified, the only kind of material allowed on Clinton's server.

43 posted on 01/31/2016 9:07:10 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
The question is why (surprisingly) Clinton hack George Stephanopoulos decided to press Hillary on it.

So when the she debates whichever repub candidate- she can claim old news was dealt with in January

44 posted on 02/01/2016 12:38:15 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux

No. this is just more Kabuki theater. Just one more layer of we went over this already even my good friend George grilled me on this.

If George had been serious he would have asked about the email she told an aide to strip the headings off and send it to her unsecurely.

George was just faking on being a serious journalist instead of a sworn Clintonista. He failed.


45 posted on 02/01/2016 12:39:51 AM PST by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Do you understand the issue and the problem?
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Uh YES I DO!!!!!!!!!!!!

sar·casm

the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.

Although I didn’t use the ‘international symbol for sarcasm’ /sarc or whatever,

The dead giveaway should have been when I said we feared going over the horizon and falling off the earth.


46 posted on 02/01/2016 1:05:31 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98)"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn

On the other hand, the ‘system’ must not have been all that good as it appears that no matter where you were in the world, the Bar Girls were always a jump or two ahead of the Port Directors etc what ships movements were.
*****************************************************
LOL! My ship did a cruise in the Med in the early ‘60s. Girls we saw in Naples were at our next port before the ship arrived and that pattern continued for months whether France, Greece, etc., except they skipped Tripoli Libya (and so did I).


47 posted on 02/01/2016 1:39:26 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Europeans write the date like that. Not Americans.
*****************************
That is generally true. However, when in the Navy we wrote the date as dd/mm/yyyy and I have continued that pattern into my 70s on my checks and other correspondence.


48 posted on 02/01/2016 1:44:27 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
The next President could rescind the pardon.

Where does it say that?

49 posted on 02/01/2016 1:52:04 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: octex
when in the Navy we wrote the date as dd/mm/yyyy and I have continued that pattern into my 70s on my checks and other correspondence.

Somewhere around the time of the Y2K circus, I fell into the habit of writing dates as yyyy-mm-dd.

That format has two advantages:

  1. While the format is possibly unfamiliar, nobody above room temperature IQ can fail to recognize its meaning
  2. It sorts correctly, even in software that doesn't recognize it as a date

50 posted on 02/01/2016 2:08:40 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Correct me if I am wrong, but don’t you need to be convicted of something before you can be pardoned? If indicted, I seriously doubt a conviction would come before the end of BHO’s term.


51 posted on 02/01/2016 2:18:48 AM PST by Woodman (My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Woodman

No, the Nixon pardon was a pre indictment pardon for any crimes. A sitting president cannot be indicted...the only way to get him out is through impeachment. After office, all bets are off but not sure about whether the statutes on crimes tolls while he is in office.

The point here is whether Ohole pardons her or not, she could become president while under indictment. The Dems will have to decide whether she can be elected if indicted. If they think she can win even under indictment or scandal, Ohole will provide the pardon, if not or if he wants another candidate he will not.

There is no redress for a pardon, frankly it should be removed from the powers of the executive as it has no place except in a kingdom. But it is what it is.


52 posted on 02/01/2016 3:34:36 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
 
I know that this is, I think, a continuation of the story that has been playing out for months.
 
 
Come on, Honey: make up your mind.

53 posted on 02/01/2016 4:11:15 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
(History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)

How about to the day?

A year??

54 posted on 02/01/2016 4:14:17 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop
Under the constitution, Amendment XIV, one cannot become President if one has been proven to have given aid and comfort to the enemy. Keeping an unsecured server that our enemies can access lends itself to this situation, and the FBI is pursuing this as we speak/

Nope; convenience/sloppiness doesn't count as GIVING.

55 posted on 02/01/2016 4:16:30 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: octex

The Right way, the Wrong way and the Navy way.


56 posted on 02/01/2016 4:19:17 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: octex

Hillary hates the military and has never served a day.

Remember how she couldn’t get hired when she wanted to enlist because she is a woman?/s


57 posted on 02/01/2016 4:38:55 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

I remember hearing that when Ford pardoned Nixon.


58 posted on 02/01/2016 4:55:10 AM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Think I’ll throw this into this email mix just to be a pain.

On Morning Joe or the like, ex-Senator S. Brown made the remark that there is more to the email bit than has been mentioned relating to H’s time as SecState. This concerns her refusal to have Boko Harum listed as a terrorist group as there is some connection between that group and her Fund/Foundation, some quid pro quo as yet hidden ...

I wonder if this ‘connection’ has something to do with Benghazi and BH’s potential take over of some 60 countries in Africa, now being the world’s leading Islamic group by body count. Right now there is an impending link up between ISIS in southern Libya and BH moving north to the Libyan border.


59 posted on 02/01/2016 5:01:44 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Blasted autocorrect.


60 posted on 02/01/2016 5:07:37 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson