Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TBP

Exactly. Difference is the apparent claim to “inject competition” into the mix. Notably impossible thing to do in freaking government provided (not contracted— provided) national healthcare. Key point is the support of the corporatist viewpoint— cost shift healthcare onto the backs of the taxpayers— and do it even more than obamaumaocare— which has already failed in exponential magnitude, for which we, the taxpayers are being pushed to increase the damn subsidies (even as we have doubled and tripled our OWN premiums). A racket.. a govt. racket.


43 posted on 01/31/2016 3:33:18 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby

There could well be a system of “choose Caesarcare or some private arrangement.”


45 posted on 01/31/2016 3:34:35 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson