Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

“The issue is national security. A self sufficient USA needs X gallons of liquid fuel per year produced within our borders by us. Until we have that we are vulnerable to the hatred of nations that have us over a “barrel”.

There is no problem with ethanol that cannot be solved and most already are.”

that is ridiculous. If you were really interested in national security, then you should be lobbying against the demonization of coal and nuclear. Those are far, far better than ethanol, and a lot, lot cheaper for energy security, and are plentiful for us in this country.

Ethanol jus rewards bad business practices in a non-commercial enterprise.


42 posted on 01/31/2016 2:40:48 PM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: doldrumsforgop

I do argue for coal and nuke. ALL forms combine to make a total amount of liquid fuel needed.

AND it is the best octane booster.

AND electric cars still suck


43 posted on 01/31/2016 2:46:41 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson