Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Presbyterian Reporter

12% plus or minus of our liquid fuel is ethanol. It is the preferred octane booster. Engines that can use ethanol can also use methanol. Methanol can be produced from coal our most plentiful form of energy AND cleanly. Every large quantity is important. We produce that 12% and have too much food if the American waistline is any indication.

Besides no one figures into their cost formulas for ethanol that once the alcohol is produced the grain doesn’t disappear. It is perfectly viable feed for cattle with everything remaining except the sugar. Protein and other nutrients are just fine.
There is no good argument against ethanol. National security and farmers are right. Doctrinaire textbook conservatives haven’t even begun to factor in the blood and treasure we have spent on the middle east.

Thank God for the rural, religious American farmer


40 posted on 01/31/2016 2:29:50 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
12% plus or minus of our liquid fuel is ethanol. It is the preferred octane booster.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. 3-methyl-heptane is the preferred octane booster. Ethanol is an inferior fuel. It costs more than gasoline, and it provides less energy.

People who use 90/10 gasoline/ethanol mixes get less miles per gallon than those who run 100% gasoline. And on top of that, ethanol attracts water, which means that it cannot be shipped via pipeline and must be transported over road by tanker trucks. It also damages engines.

70 posted on 01/31/2016 6:44:48 PM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson