Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sphinx
The 1790 statute was repealed and revised 5 years later. The language is clear and since Cruz's father had just taken the oath for citizenship to Canada he certainly cannot be considered resident under the definition of the time:

And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

Residency was defined in that same act as someone under oath declaring that they wished to remain and live in the Untied States.

80 posted on 01/30/2016 12:09:38 PM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: JayGalt

So you are standing firm on the legal inferiority of women under the Constitution? Good luck with that.


91 posted on 01/30/2016 12:19:17 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: JayGalt

So you are standing firm on the legal inferiority of women under the Constitution? Good luck with that.


148 posted on 01/30/2016 1:26:07 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson