[[Since you appear to be avoiding a cite to our past discussion]]
Sorry- I just assumed you knew the discussion I was referring to- and didn’t think you needed a cite- since we’re basically discussing the same thing here, and I’ve linked to the CRS article I brought up In the other thread, here-
You advocate a point of view here (and pretend, although not convincingly, that it isn't your view, merely a view expressed by others), and unless I popped in and spouted off, you'd not point out our two weeks old exchange.