[Cboldt]

We talked about all those before, including Tuan Anh Nguyen v. INS (which merely notes that some naturalization statutes include a process, and other naturalization statutes don't) and the CRS document.

You don't even acknowledge that. Convenient memory, I suppose.

[Bob434]

[[Convenient memory, I suppose. ]]

Must you?-

I addressed that In the other thread- That case, first of all wasn’t the only case- Secondly- that case specifically indicated that cases where a woman was travelling abroad, and had a baby, the baby is not a foreigner- The court made it clear that there is no difference in her child’s status as full citizen because the child is citizen via jus sanguinis-

[[[T]he statute simply ensures equivalence between two expectant mothers who are citizens abroad if one chooses to reenter for the child’s birth and the other chooses not to return, or does not have the means to do so.163]] (page 40)

[[which merely notes that some naturalization statutes include a process, and other naturalization statutes don’t]]

And the court recognized that those that don’t are afforded the status of ‘at birth’ those that do are ‘after birth’ and require an act which makes them ineligible for presidency because they aren’t considered NBC- it was ‘To ensure the equivalence of a child born in states or out to a mother who was a citizen’