Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not the Onion..........
1 posted on 01/30/2016 9:13:01 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Sub-Driver

They KNOW she will not be INDICTED!


2 posted on 01/30/2016 9:16:10 AM PST by corbe (mystified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Hitlary Clinton should NEVER, repeat NEVER EVER be allowed to become POTUS. Jail Time, I would go along with but not POTUS.


3 posted on 01/30/2016 9:17:18 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver


4 posted on 01/30/2016 9:17:51 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! I reallyRead it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
The communists machine headed by King Obama will make sure Hillary gets the nomination. He will place her under the umbrella of protection and will make sure those that go against his wishes suffer.
5 posted on 01/30/2016 9:17:52 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Words fail me.


6 posted on 01/30/2016 9:18:32 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I still say they will draft Biden before the Democrat Convention.


7 posted on 01/30/2016 9:18:50 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
How could you NOT vote for America's grandma?


8 posted on 01/30/2016 9:19:58 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

Not surprising that the NYT can be so wrong. After all, they touted Obozo in 2008 as the answer to the US's problems. How'd that work out for ya? This writer has the IQ of dust.

10 posted on 01/30/2016 9:21:01 AM PST by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The NYT enorses Hillary? How unexpected !! [/s]


11 posted on 01/30/2016 9:21:08 AM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Yes ! We can rent out the Oral office for sex orgies (Bill can be master of ceremonies). While Hillary serves out her sentence in Sing Sing or GuantAnamo Yippee!


12 posted on 01/30/2016 9:21:16 AM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver


                Crazy???                                               Drunk???


She's still breathing... look closely...

13 posted on 01/30/2016 9:23:45 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Everyone better line up behind the Hildebeast. I don’t want anything to happen to her.....yet. Let’s hope for a September “surprise.” It’s crucial that she is on the ballot at the end of the convention because once she is the nominee, SHE IS THE NOMINEE. They cannot remove her even if she is caught murdering someone. Once you are on the ballot as your party’s nominee, you are. That’s the law. They can no longer swap her out for Biden or Hiawatha.

If anyone gets Dem calls at home, remember, you are the biggest Hillary fan ever!

P.S. The reason I say this, is that fully 30% of the population will vote for Hillary Clinton, even if she is being frogmarched off the podium in handcuffs. Trust me. I know a couple people like this!


14 posted on 01/30/2016 9:26:52 AM PST by Dana1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

NYT: “We were big fans of Stalin. We love Clinton, too.”


15 posted on 01/30/2016 9:27:13 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history."

Who are they trying to kid? Hillary's camp must have written this garbage themselves.

16 posted on 01/30/2016 9:27:46 AM PST by sockhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Not the Onion..........


ROTFLMAO!!!!!


17 posted on 01/30/2016 9:33:50 AM PST by samtheman (Elect Trump, Build Wall. End Censorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Wouldn’t it be something if she were the nominee and say around October THEN she is indicted? LOL LOL LOL!


19 posted on 01/30/2016 9:37:15 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Indeed. Was this written by Chelsea?


20 posted on 01/30/2016 9:39:29 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The Clinton Legacy continues:


21 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:47 AM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party.

Slam! Instant winner! Who needs any more reason than that? Everything after that in the article is just blah, blah, blah.

Really, there must be one or two secrets the country has that some foreign enemy must want.

22 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:47 AM PST by seowulf (Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum. Cogito.---Ambrose Bierce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party.

The first woman - first quisling - first person convicted of espionage... "Firsts" are important to the New York Times because they measure their worth in prizes, not 'readers who trust them'...

23 posted on 01/30/2016 9:44:27 AM PST by GOPJ (If the FBI was investigating Cruz for espionage could Rubio call off the press like Sanders did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson