Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

“I weep that we have sunk so low that we are willing to put a megalomaniac, narcissistic demagogue into office and then re-elect him and then we are poised to replace him with someone who is just as much a megalomaniac, narcissistic demagogue, if not more.”

I think the times call for a leader, who is willing to fight until his last breath for our country - instead of the polite, girly men we are dished up by the Uniparty

We need a man who can visit rough justice when necessary to put our interests first.

We need a man who is offended by political correctness and political wimps.

We need a Patton.

We need a Grant.

We need a strong person who knows how to walk away from a bad deal.

All great leaders in history have had an over-developed ego.

At this time in history, we need a nationalist - even a moderate nationalist.

And we need someone who will beat the tar out of Hillary until the last vote is cast on November 4th - and who won’t stop the beating until every vote is counted and they declare him the winner by a huge margin - and still won’t stop the beating until she is without a political future and wearing prison orange.

I see only one such person in this race. It isn’t Cruz.


129 posted on 01/29/2016 4:40:16 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (As a representative of Earth, I officially welcome Global Warming to our planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion

Oh contrare....

We need a Patton? You mean, a commander who was a third generation offspring of a wealthy military family? Although he suffered with dyslexia, he graduated from West Point in 1909. And during WW II, he commanded the Seventh Army in Sicily and later the Third Army in France and Germany and he attained the rank of General (4 stars).

We need a Grant? You mean, the man who even though he achieved fame on the battlefield, was particularly squeamish? Did you know Grant could not stomach the sight of animal blood and Rare steak nauseated him; he insisted that his meat be well done. He never touched fowl. “I could never eat anything that went on two legs,” he explained. He did not hunt, even as a boy in rural southern Ohio where shooting game was a favorite youthful past time. Grant was modest, self-effacing, soft-spoken, and mild-mannered. One biographer, W.E. Woodward, went so far as to suggest that he was bit effeminate. “Young Grant had a girl’s primness of manner and modesty of conduct,” he wrote. “There was a broad streak of the feminine in his personality. He was almost half-woman. But this strain was buried in the depths of his soul; it never came to the surface, except indirectly, and he was probably not aware of it himself.” Grant was somewhat prudish. He seldom used foul language. He disliked dirty jokes. And in the field he always bathed alone in a closed tent, never allowing even his aides to glimpse him naked. A serious, well-disciplined soldier, Grant spurned military pomp and pageantry. He was loyal to friends. A superstitious man, he believed it bad luck to retrace one’s steps. If he inadvertently walked beyond his destination, for example, he would not simply turn around and walk back down the same street, but rather would keep going further away from the place and return via another road.

Because if that’s your definition of what we need, Trump ain’t it, either. That you would think we need a nationalist, at this time in history, shows your very lack of knowing history.

Just because he’s saying things, does not make him realiable to follow through, ESPECIALLY, when the man flips and flops on EVERY issue. We need someone who is bold, yes. We need someone who does not bow to political correctness, but still has the humiliy and the dignity to behave with respect to the position he holds. As well, one who has respect for those he serves. We don’t need a King, we don’t want a King, we need someone to get the government out of our way and be a leader in the terms of being a good influence on society, not someone who insists he is the one to LEAD the government, and screw with anyone who doesn’t agree with how he does it, literally.

For someone who has spent the majority of his life, learning, studying, discussing, debating, literally fighting, for the Constitution and it’s framework, all the way up to the Supreme Court, he may be stiff at times, but he has all the qualities we need, at this time, to get this country back and turned away from a very evil place. Obama and Co. have taken us boldly to the left. We do not need a mush-middle candidate, like Trump. We need a bold candidate, to take us back to the right, like Cruz. And they doubted him to win in TX for Senator, and how’d that turn out?


140 posted on 01/29/2016 6:26:45 PM PST by Lucky9teen (God's blessing has been on America from the very beginning, and I believe God isn't done yet. TCruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson