1 posted on
01/29/2016 11:31:25 AM PST by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: BenLurkin
Too damaging? To Klinton? From her personal unsecured server?
50 posted on
01/29/2016 12:01:05 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
To: BenLurkin
So, last week they said they have to take a month off from releasing emails due to the blizzard (which happened on a weekend no less), and now they can't release some emails because they're "too secret to release".
Any week now they're going to pull the good old "the server crashed" routine to drag this out even longer.
What a joke.
To: BenLurkin
Looks like someone has found the Q clearance violations that intel RUMINT has been saying:
(DOE/NNSA/OST) NSI/CNWDI/RD/FRD are going to be released.
IF Hillary SOLD that data ..........
57 posted on
01/29/2016 12:11:03 PM PST by
DCBryan1
(No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
To: BenLurkin
Under the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, there is an exemption that allows for highly sensitive, and in this case classified, material to be withheld in full — which means nothing would be released in these cases, not even heavily redacted versions, which has been standard practice with the 1,340 such emails made public so far by the State Department.
If that is not enough (1,340), to indict her right now, today, they will never have enough.
This old man is ready to join a ten million man march on D.C. to demand that the witch be tried.
Enough is enough. Bring on C.W. 2
62 posted on
01/29/2016 12:16:23 PM PST by
Graybeard58
(Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
To: BenLurkin
Under the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, there is an exemption that allows for highly sensitive, and in this case classified, material to be withheld in full — which means nothing would be released in these cases, not even heavily redacted versions, which has been standard practice with the 1,340 such emails made public so far by the State Department.
If that is not enough (1,340), to indict her right now, today, they will never have enough.
This old man is ready to join a ten million man march on D.C. to demand that the witch be tried.
Enough is enough. Bring on C.W. 2
63 posted on
01/29/2016 12:16:23 PM PST by
Graybeard58
(Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
To: BenLurkin
Clinton emails ‘too damaging’ to be released to anyone except the enemy.
81 posted on
01/29/2016 12:42:55 PM PST by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: BenLurkin
All of you - STOP the hate speech!
Hillary’s emails were all private correspondence about yoga and wedding plans.
Why can’t you right-wing conspirators shut up!!!!!!
Oh - /sarc
92 posted on
01/29/2016 1:03:18 PM PST by
oldbill
To: BenLurkin
94 posted on
01/29/2016 1:15:24 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: BenLurkin
If she gets away with this, then anyone can do anything from now on and not get in trouble either! Or can they?
To: BenLurkin
Trust me, the politicized corrupt Obama administration is never going to indict Shrillary. She has the goods on Obie and he has already AG Loretta to figure out a way to drop this, OR to indict the aides thereby freeing Hitlery to pursue her coronation.
97 posted on
01/29/2016 1:33:13 PM PST by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
My guess now is that the meeting between Sanders and Obama, was to let him know that Biden will be entering the race.
This report isn't from our side, it's theirs. I had gone on record that i though a Hilary indictment was about 10%, but with recent developments now I am upping that to about 60%..
114 posted on
01/29/2016 2:46:06 PM PST by
catfish1957
(I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
To: BenLurkin
Here is an interesting question. If they are so classified and confidential, how can they be used as evidence in court? Her defense attorney may counter that redactment is inadmissible.
Then what?????
116 posted on
01/29/2016 2:49:18 PM PST by
catfish1957
(I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
To: BenLurkin
I won’t be happy until she is facing life behind bars for her crimes.
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
*Yawn* Dirty and corrupt, everybody knows it, yet she will walk away unscathed..
143 posted on
01/29/2016 7:00:56 PM PST by
cardinal4
(Certified Islamophobe)
To: BenLurkin
144 posted on
01/29/2016 7:05:41 PM PST by
doug from upland
(Some of you keep telling yourself -- Romney would have been as bad or worse.)
To: BenLurkin
What do they mean by “too damaging”? As in too damaging to The One?
153 posted on
01/30/2016 8:51:23 AM PST by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
To: ASA Vet
154 posted on
01/30/2016 9:11:42 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Trump is the wrecking ball destroying GOPe, FAUX & their bs mediot conspirators & beltway pundits!)
To: Alas Babylon!; American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; arthurus; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Ax; ...
158 posted on
01/30/2016 12:42:43 PM PST by
ASA Vet
(Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson