fox says it was the best ever.
I wonder who is lying?
It wasn’t the best because the first one had about 24 million viewers and the 2nd one about 12 million.
It was worse in viewership than all other debates except the prior Fox Business debate.
However, this one was extremely high visibility and a challenge match. It was the super bowl of struggles and over half the people of the previous high tuned OUT. Not IN.
fox says it was the best ever.I wonder who is lying?
That really is the heart of the matter. FOX News is literally lying. Their propaganda relies on comparing debates on two separate networks. This lie is breathtaking in scope.
People should consider the gravity of this. Imagine a true earthshaking event: a Constitutional crisis, an Electoral war, a Constitutional Convention raided by the Feds, a Waco type siege, Nuclear detonation in the USA, martial law, Second Amendment repeal, etc. In such an event how could Fox News be trusted to be reporting news and not government propaganda?
I'll note that there is precedent for their deceptions. They went in the tank for Barry in 2008 when the network all but banned his middle name "Hussein" and also neutralized any discussion of his Moslem ties and of course his foreign father ( first candidate ever! and that is by definition newsworthy ). There were meetings between Axelrod and Murdoch and others and discussion of these meetings was also muted ( where were you Sean Hannity? ).
This all amounts to clear evidence of collusion between news agencies and the government, and it is all in plain sight. That rat Cronkite was more independent by comparison. This is almost Soviet sponsored television when the larger picture is considered.