Posted on 01/29/2016 8:22:23 AM PST by Trumpinator
A Russian journalist explains why there is no corruption in Russia
By Adam Taylor January 28 at 2:33 PM
What could possibly explain this disagreement about corruption? One potential explanation has been put forward by Russian journalist Anton Orekh, who, writing for the Yezhednevny Zhurnal, explained that Russians don't really have a word for corruption. While the Treasury may well have found what looks like corruption "from an American-European point of view," Orekh explains, Russians simply don't see it that way.
If that sounds like a remarkable argument, it's worth noting that Orekh is known as a progressive journalist and the Yezhednevy Zhurnal is an independent publication that Moscow has tried to ban in the past. Orekh isn't justifying or excusing corruption; he's making an observation about Russian attitudes. More of Orekh's article is below, as summarized by the longtime Russia-watcher Paul Goble on his blog:
For Russians, what was shown is “not corruption†but rather a manifestation of friendship and a kindly responsiveness to the needs of those around him. “Corruption is some kind of imported word,†Orekh says; and that may be why Russians can’t really fight against it because they do not understand this phenomenon the way the West does.
“In the West,†Orekh continues, “money gives power, but among [Russians] it is just the reverse: power gives money and also takes money away as well.â€
Putin doesn’t need billions in cash or stocks, “if he owns the entire country!†the commentator continues. “The extent of his wealth is in fact equal to the size of the budget of the country, or even more to the size of all its national wealth. At any moment, he can get absolutely everything he needs and practically in any quantity.â€
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
This is right out of Beowulf.
It is not even a case of him asking for a bribe - he does not need to.
Also, in Russia it seems power is wealth while in the west, wealth is power.
I don't think Putin has one dime in the bank the say the last Haitian dictator had stolen money - he just asks and whatever he needs is provided by his thralls.
If anyone recalls, under the USSR, Stalin was called "the Boss" which is almost kind of reverting to their drott origins of society.
To my thinking anyway.
It may be that to an ordinary Russian when they hear Western reports that Putin controls all this wealth they may shrug and say - of course - what's the problem - he is the leader.
There is no corruption in Russia like there are no homosexuals in Iran
Russia is not pro-free enterprise, therefore it cannot be corrupt. Very much the same as 0bama, or any member of the Democrat or Socialist Party.
It is called obedience.
You do not comply, you get pneumonia or firing squad.
If there is the hope of squeezing something out of you, then mercy - Gulag.
Apparatchiks are rewarded by special privileges that working class can only dream about.
Seeeee? No corruption.
There is no murder in paradise, and apparently no corruption either.
“I don’t think Putin has one dime in the bank “
L O L
Just because he can ask for anything he wants & get it, doesn’t mean he doesn’t have billions in the bank (or elsewhere)
Lol. Exactly
It is not even a case of him asking for a bribe - he does not need to.
William Browder, a hedge fund manager who has worked extensively in Russia, has claimed that Putin allows the remaining oligarchs to continue without being arrested in exchange for a high percentage of their profits, perhaps 50%.
What I was trying to point out based on the article - is unlike the stereotypical dictator with money in Swiss bank accounts - Putin has no need of that - he can get money from wherever at will. It’s a nuanced understanding of the matter.
A broader read on the same dynamic.
------------
It's a nuanced approach - but think of it this way - the Aztecs did not think human sacrifice was murder the way the Spanish did. When the Spanish told the Aztecs it was wrong the concept was incomprehensible to the Aztecs that the human sacrifice was wrong.
---------
From a western perspective that seems like corruption. From a Russian historical cultural aspect that is normal and how things should be done.
Kind of reminds me that old story of the Russians coordinating with the Austrians to fight Napoleon but the Russians arrived 13 days latter because they used a different calendar system.
It is corruption. It's probably the biggest bribe that ever occurred in history.
From a Russian historical cultural aspect that is normal and how things should be done.
Translation: Russia is a hopelessly corrupt country.
-----
Per western standards yes but it is an interesting contrast nonetheless.
Perhaps he is not fluent in Russian ?
try this
https://twitter.com/search?q=%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BF%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F
What a waste - the article went into nuances and that flies over some peoples heads.
lol - apparently yours
There is every corruption in Russia.
There is equal corruption in the USA.
Mullahs’ Iran is modelled on and supported by the USA.
No nuances, those you replied to here are simply corrupt too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.