Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lacrew

To add to your list:

- Because the PR aspect of the shuttle needed to plant the idea of space travel as routine, the shuttle was designed to land like a conventional aircraft. This meant landing gear, wings, and systems to control an aircraft-like landing process.

Much weight, cost, and complexity could have been saved if the shuttle simply splashed down in the ocean like a typical space craft returning from orbit, but that didn’t fit NASA’s marketing plans.


35 posted on 01/29/2016 8:24:23 AM PST by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeWarrior

I think they had some problems with the splashdowns...at least one went to the bottom of the ocean, I believe...and there was always the risk of Soviet interference, if the Navy couldn’t get there first. So I think there was some legitimacy to the desire to land on soil instead of ocean.

But I certainly do remember the kumbyah atmosphere of the early shuttle program...which never really stopped.


55 posted on 01/29/2016 8:37:32 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson