Posted on 01/29/2016 7:54:30 AM PST by ghost of stonewall jackson
See that there is exactly what I’m talking about.
In a seemingly serious discussion, you can’t even stand the mere suggestion that your candidate (hero/champion) has flaws.
That’s a delusional fantasy that will leave you crying.
“In a seemingly serious discussion, you can’t even stand the mere suggestion that your candidate (hero/champion) has flaws.”
You’re delusional, pal. You have a stereotype in your head of Trump supporters that makes you say stupid nonsense like that. There is nothing in evidence of any of my posts that even remotely suggests what you said, yet, you feel compelled to say it.
Best thing I’ve ever read by Carlson. If it wasn’t 4 months late (7 years, really), it would be brilliant.
But seriously, this is an article worth spreading to friends and family.
Your posts, your sycophant thought process, is proof that you fit the bill.
All Trump supporters? No. But you? Absolutely.
You’re like the nasty football fan who no one wants to sit next to, even or especially when he’s backing your team.
If you don’t want to be treated like a mindless sycophant, then stop posting like one.
He nails it. Nails it.
After Obama, damn straight we want someone to protect the existence of this country. Damn straight.
Well Duh...everyone does favors for people they like.
But there is a Grand Canyon wide difference between Trump’s self funded campaign and all other career politicians who are COMPELLED to obey their ultra-rich donors first, if they hope to ever get re-elected.
I do not know of a single FR Trump supporter who claims Trump is as pure as wind driven snow. But it is obvious, Trump is more likely to push agenda to help the country than career politicians who must push agenda to comply with demands of their rich donors.
I don’t think its obvious that Trump is more likely to push agenda to help the country than career politicians who must push agenda to comply with demands of their rich donors.
All the same applies to Bloomberg, right?
So as I said, I’ll hitchhike for what I can get with a President Trump, but I think there is no reason at all to think he would name an origninalist to SCOTUS.
Bloomberg is OPENLY extreme liberal on guns and immigration. Not a valid comparison with Trump.
Not saying they are the same person. I'm speaking to your point, that not being funded by someone else is a virtue.
It can be a virtue, but when you say Trump doesn't owe anyone anything, just remember that you are one of those people he doesn't owe anything to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.