Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babygene

OK, LOL, I was trying to get away with abbreviating but you’re not gonna let me are you?! Ha ha. I can understand eminent domain under certain narrow circumstances. However when it’s for the good of entrepreneurs and business men? No they should not be able to take my possessions, my property!! that


178 posted on 01/29/2016 9:34:26 AM PST by Shimmer1 ("I like nonsense; it wakes up the brain cells." -Dr. Seuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: Shimmer1

“However when it’s for the good of entrepreneurs and business men? No they should not be able to take my possessions, my property!!”

It wasn’t being done for the good of entrepreneurs and business men. It was done by the city for the city of AC.

I don’t know if you’ve been to AC (before and after the casinos), but before it was a slum. Property was worth next to nothing. This house was purchased (before the casinos were built for twenty thousand or so. During the same period houses on the shore, both north and south of AC were selling for 200 to 300 thousand. AC was a slum...

The casinos brought billions of dollars to the city and state and tens of thousands of high paying jobs.

The house in question was an eyesore sitting among billion dollar buildings. The city wanted it gone. Nobody was trying to cheat her... she was offered 50 times what it was worth and that wasn’t enough for her.


185 posted on 01/29/2016 10:32:12 AM PST by babygene (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson