Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

I understand.

What I do not understand is your original comments to me that seemed to imply that a naturalized citizen is the same as a natural born citizen.

What you sent me says otherwise.

Is this a contradiction?


132 posted on 01/30/2016 6:33:35 AM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: doldrumsforgop

“What I do not understand is your original comments to me that seemed to imply that a naturalized citizen is the same as a natural born citizen.”

No, not at all. Somehow you’ve misunderstood. The two forms of citizenship are diametrically opposed to each other. Natural born citizenship requires undivided allegiance and obedience to only one sovereign who is the sovereign in the jurisdiction where the person is born. Naturalized citizenship is required to take a person who is born with or afterwards acquires a duty of allegiance to a foreign sovereign and then confer upon them a divide allegiance of statutory citizenship which confers upon them some of the duties, obligations, and protections of domestic citizenship upon adopting allegiance to the domestic sovereign.

“What you sent me says otherwise.”

I don’t see how it could do so.


133 posted on 01/30/2016 7:50:41 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson