“Yeah well, how come pro-lifers didn’t just tell SCOTUS to pound sand back in 1973. Instead they accepted the premise that abortion was automatically established law, and then tried to stop abortion through violent means rather than the excellent work they’re doing now.”
They DID try. Are you saying that you aren’t old enough to remember those debates? Or are you saying that you didn’t watch them? I did.
Then, you have people like Bernard Nathanson who was at the head of the right to abortion committee...can’t recall the name of it now, but who now publicly admits that the numbers they came up with before the supreme court were falsified. Why hasn’t the supreme court brought this kind of fraud to the forefront to demand an explanation for lying to the court? Why no perjury charges?
Somebody in high places wanted this abortion a whole lot more than the women who have experienced them. Find out who THAT is, and see about taking him/her down.
It’s a multibillion dollar industry...good luck.
And...do some homework on the history of the prolife efforts before making accusations.
I'm not talking "debates." I'm talking about civil disobedience and just flat-out ignoring the ruling.
How come that didn't happen?