To: xzins
What it doesnât explain is why the need for armed agents to confront them in the first place. They were driving to a meeting which included THE SHERIFF of all people.
That is where I think we see the hand of the political class and upper level bureaucrats. Forcing an armed confrontation with the protestors serves their ends (advancing the gun control agenda, increasing the specter of "homegrown" terrorism, etc.), and they know the media will back their message.
To: Scirparius
This is why I say it’s Waco all over again, although with fewer casualties.
There simply wasn’t any immediate threat that there had to be a confrontation.
173 posted on
01/27/2016 10:50:34 AM PST by
xzins
(Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson