“I can only conclude that Cruz’s vote for the Corker Bill is okay with you, and that’s fine.”
That is what I said, and that is my conclusion. If my conclusion is wrong, feel free to steer me in the right direction. So far, all you have done is ramble in a pointless manner about Trump, who had not a thing to do with Cruz’ vote on the Corker Bill.
“you have one sin on cruz and obsess on it - who would be a better choice?”
It’s a pretty big sin, don’t you think? I notice Levin never talks about it. It’s not a fun thing to talk about.
And as to who would be a better choice?
Oh, I don’t know, someone who didn’t use their elected position of power to flip the Senate Treaty Provision on it’s head so our president could make a deal with a terrorist nation maybe?
don’t care what your conclusion is - I was pointing out that you trump supporters base your conclusions on information you don’t have - like a liberal
so the answer to my question is who?