[dem bums]

Yes, we've gone over this before, and you continue to ignore the fact that the issue is not whether she lost her house or not - the issue is Trump's attempt (successful or not) to use his government cronies to take her house when she refused to sell it to him. That he would even try tells me all I need to know about how he views the role of government power, and his view of crony capitalism. The fact that he was unsuccessful (because she had the good fortune to have excellent pro bono lawyers) means nothing.

[kiryandil]

Yes, we've gone over this before, and you continue to ignore the fact that the issue is not whether she lost her house or not - the issue is Trump's attempt (successful or not) to use his government cronies to take her house when she refused to sell it to him. That he would even try tells me all I need to know about how he views the role of government power, and his view of crony capitalism. The fact that he was unsuccessful (because she had the good fortune to have excellent pro bono lawyers) means nothing.

It wasn't her house.

It's the government's house.

She just rented it, like you and I rent our houses from the government.