Norm, I was the editor of my High School Literary Magazine. The building was not bulldozed. If they had said, “attempted but failed to bulldoze”, or something such as that, then it would be a truthful statement. As it stands, it implies that the building was bulldozed by Donald Trump. That is not true.
These are the same tactics that Dewhurst used against Ted in the Senate Runoff election: “In the hotly contested U.S. Senate race, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has suggested that his rival, former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, puts the interests of China above those of the United States.” Read more about the deceptions on both sides at:
http://www.texastribune.org/2012/06/22/ted-cruz-and-china-fact-box/
Good for you. I was the Senior Ed of a website that was No.2 only to NASCAR in it’s category with a 7 figure readership, followed up by many years as a reporter and editor at a Tri-state regional newspaper/newsgroup.
You wanna compare junk some more?
They are tactics Trump has used against Cruz, by implying that margin loans secured by personal securities holdings - loans that are available to all and sundry - were the result of special favors promised to Goldman Sachs and Citibank. The birther nonsense is yet another instance of Trump's dirty tricks. Trump can dish it out but can't take it.
If Trump gets the nomination, stories like this will make newspaper front pages and news websites every hour every day of the week. It's time he got used to being pulverized. Right now, the liberal media is pulling its punches - only opinion articles nobody reads are criticizing Trump. When he wins the nomination, Trump's dirty linen will be featured as headline articles.
Explain how exactly it was a “lie”. Trump used eminent domain in order to bulldoze a woman’s house. This is not a lie, but indeed a fact. That the order was reversed by an honest judge doesn’t change things.
Here are more facts:
She didn’t want to sell. She didn’t sell to Guccione, and she wouldn’t sell to him.
He didn’t like that, so he convinced Atlantic City to do his dirty work for him.
She fought back and won.
He and his surrogates are trying to say he changed his mind. He didn’t - the judge did it for him.
But again, by all means, keep defending it. I think Trump should pay for ads in NH and IA explaining exactly what happened. I’m sure the other campaigns wouldn’t mind chipping in.
Yep, didn't like Dewhurst doing that in Texas and I don't like how this ad seems to infer that they bulldozed her house down. Vera's story is really interesting, as is the discussion of eminent domain, they didn't have to muck it up with innuendos.