So, if someone is trying to set fire to a building and someone comes along and throws water on it before it can catch the building on fire, the arsonist is not guilty of what he was trying to do? That’s essentially the defense you are offering for Trump in this instance. This is what happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmM4ZBoppNQ&list=PLJcbhHQDR9da0H3-Qs-7WEEj6tam9vlh3&index=4
So, if someone is trying to set fire to a building and someone comes along and throws water on it before it can catch the building on fire, the arsonist is not guilty
-————————————————————————————If a politico came out and lied saying he had burned the building to the ground, I would be curious why he would lie.
Are you now comparing eminent domain to someone who is an arsonist? This is really getting silly.