[beandog]

Well since he has no problem cheating on his wives why should he have a problem cheating at everything else he does.

I really want it explained to me when FR became okay with supporting for President a man who cheats on his wife. I thought we were better than that.

[Just mythoughts]

The question is ‘original intent’ of the Constitutional requirement to be eligible to hold the office of president. Trump's adulteries as you accuse, are irrelevant to eligibility. The people get to decide if adultery is what makes an eligible candidate morally competent to hold the office.

Sometimes we cannot have what we want, fact of life. Informed citizenry do not fall for deceptive practices. We ignore the Constitution, we are no better than those that abuse it for their self serving purposes.

Esau sold his birthright for a ‘red’ bowl of pottage (lentils) God made sure he lost his blessing. And as it Written God hated Esau.