Absolutely but their success would be limited in those areas with concealed or open carry.
You can be sure the illegitimate and corrupt politicians in Congress and the White House wouldn’t care. They simply do not care about us, the citizens any longer. And it’s our fault for not voting them out of office and for being so pacific when our rights are abridged and we are ignoted.
Riiiiiight. After all, the two San Bernardino killers were THOROUGHLY vetted, and look how nicely THAT turned out.
When you “vet” someone, the first requirement is that you actually LOOK for disqualifiers, and are prepared to sieze upon them if you find any.
It’s OBVIOUS that the democRAT administration merely conducts a faux, unserious vetting. This opinion is borne out by their unwillingness to link terrorism with islam; lieing to themselves and to the Nation. Just like the speaker in this article lied to us just now.
Of course there will be more shootings. The thing that’s been missing, other than at that muhammad cartoon contest last year, is for some of OUR people to shoot back at them.
Direct link with migrants not yet established???
BULLSHI@!!!
With open borders, Obama and his fellow Muslims and socialists in control of immigration, and zero accountability with regard to the “migrants” who jump the fence, it’s just a matter of time. We’ve done EVERYTHING to make it easy for them, with the exception of delivering an invitation.
It does not need to be in any case
affirming that America has a strict vetting system
It does not. It is a lie!
It is not “if” but “when.”
The writer wants you to think screening is the same as vetting. It is NOT.
He wants you to think we have even an adequate screening process, which we do not. It is a lie.
Keep the author's name on file so you can hunt for him after we are attacked.
It WILL happen here. It HAS happened here.
The only difference is, we shoot the crazy Muzzies faster here.
Only if We the People allow it.
Could deadly Islamic attacks occur here in the US.
It’s possible that jihadists might carry out a large scale violent attack on American people, like a Beslan school siege.
That could kill hundreds of innocent citizens.
However, what keeps Gov’t InfraGard threat analysts up at night, is how easily large parts of the electricity grid can be taken out by a coordinated sniper attack on high stakes power transformers.
High power transformers are largely visible, unprotected, and poorly surveiled.
A simultaneous targetted attack on mission critical power transformers could cause devastating power interruption to military bases, refineries, nuclear power plants, chemical plants, metal founderies, large datacenter server farms, telecommunication hubs, and cause very costly harm to the economy and crucial supply chain.
An effective attack on our infrastructure, be it power, water or food, could kill scores more than a firearms assault.
Terrorists performed a trial run a few years ago, and it’s been unsolved to this day.
Assault on California Power Station Raises Alarm on Potential for ...
www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527023048511045793591... Proxy
Feb 5, 2014 ... A sniper attack in April that knocked out an electrical substation near ... Shooting for 19 minutes, they surgically knocked out 17 giant transformers that funnel power to San Jose...
This article needs a giant “projectile barf alert.”
Of course it could. Like a high school basketball game? Church?
Not if, but when.
The mythical ostrich, his head buried in the sands of self-inflicted ignorance, never solved his social problems.
I, for one, am frankly very happy to have experts like these to help me along with my life. I've gotta tell you, my fears that similar attacks will happen in America have completely melted away after reading this article.
As a way of thanking these wonderful experts for their wonderful expertise I would like to give them all a small piece of advice: sue the higher education institute at which you received your higher education. You did not get what you paid for.
It WILL happen here.
The problem with this typical professorial reasoning is that it only considers “known knowns” in the equation, and thus cannot logically arrive at other possible and less obvious terrorist intentions and plans. It cannot even begin to ponder “unknowns” or design an offensive strategy.
This is very different from military reasoning, but then we as a country seem to have decided not to view this invasion as an attack or act of war. Hence we are always responding to islamic terrorism on the defensive.