Why have a civil conversation. The attacks on Trump are things like: He’s a Nazi. He’s Adolf Hitler. He’s a tyrant. He’s dumb. He does not know anything about government.
Donald Trump has been in the public eye for more than 30 years. We know Trump and he is not any of these things. People who want to have a conversation which starts out with; He’s dumb, or He’s evil, are not interested in winning the argument. They are just happy to have the argument. Because some people will not listen to the argument they will just take sides.
I actually think Hillary is evil. I think that the NY Times was right back in the 90’s when they called her a congenital liar. She makes her money off the understanding that she can change policy. And she is vicious when it comes to people who threaten her political fortunes.
I actually think many of the democrats agree. Thats why she, as a front runner can never close the deal. A large group of democrats are afraid of her being president. As one of the centuries most corrupt politicians, who can control her when she really does get power.
In the past two presidential elections the electorate chose someone who they did not know. And who had very little practical training for the job. This time we have two people we know pretty well. It’s all out there for us to see. I am happy to finely get real candidates instead of suits who just read teleprompters of other peoples thoughts.
That is cherry-picking the weakest and worst arguments made against him, like Stefan Molyneaux did in that hour plus video that some believe answers every criticism. It doesn't - all it does it answer the stupid, low-hanging fruit criticisms.
So forget the Hitler, dictator, racist criticisms, dumb, etc. criticisms. Forget Glenn Beck and others who make those stupid points.
What about his opposition to limiting entitlements? What about him calling Romney's plan to force illegals to self-deport "mean-spirited" and "crazy"? What about him saying that the government should pay to ensure everyone has health care? What about how forced mass deportations will all require Court hearings that would be backlogged for years even if you tripled the number of courts?