Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

In the 70s it was restricted to the Midwest because of limited production capacity. The goals for the entire country were cleaner energy and reduction in dependence on oil purchased from enemies killing Americans. What additives do you consider acceptable? Why not use something easily renewable made in America?


66 posted on 01/26/2016 5:02:42 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Neoliberalnot
In the 70s it was restricted to the Midwest because of limited production capacity.

Which demonstrates by the rest of the country, it wasn't required as a lead replacement.

What additives do you consider acceptable?

It doesn't require additives. The gasoline itself through refinery process can have enough 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane and the like to not require additives.

I have no problem with ethanol used in the free market. I have a great problem with a government mandated ethanol because the people won't choose it on their own.

67 posted on 01/26/2016 6:49:43 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Neoliberalnot

A Balanced Approach to Octane Replacement
http://www.unep.org/transport/pcfv/PDF/BalancedApproach(Lee-Chook).pdf

Lots of options exist


68 posted on 01/26/2016 7:31:03 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson