“DT: I don’t like the idea because I want to keep the lands great, and you don’t know what the state is going to do. I mean, are they going to sell if they get into a little bit of trouble? And I don’t think it’s something that should be sold. We have to be great stewards of this land. This is magnificent land. And we have to be great stewards of this land. And the hunters do such a great jobâ€â€I mean, the hunters and the fishermen and all of the different people that use that land. So I’ve been hearing more and more about that. And it’s just like the erosion of the Second Amendment. I mean, every day you hear Hillary Clinton wants to essentially wipe out the Second Amendment. We have to protect the Second Amendment, and we have to protect our lands.”
Is this what Trump really said? Isn’t it a little disjointed and disconnected? Does he have some kind of problem that keeps him from staying focused? Or is it that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about? Is he using words like great, terrific, magnificent to fill up space and stretch out his answers as I used to add superlatives to reports when I was in JHS to up the word count? His supporters appear to either not notice this about him or they’re very forgiving.
He said he didn’t want to give land to indigent states that would then sell it. It isn’t a ConLaw brouhaha it’s his opinion, which he’s allowed to have. Do you think an idiot state like Illinois wouldn’t sell any land given to them to give more to the government employees? New Mexico? Washington state ? Oregon?