Amen to that, the rinos are as evil as the dems and fems and racists facitsts of the left, like Obama.
Who do these buffoons from National Review Magazine think they are!!! I am a “Barry Goldwater: supporter from 1958 when I was 18 years old!!! These low life folks that call themselves pundits rank as bottom feeder, morons in my eyes. Don’t you dare “pee” down my back and tell me it’s raining!!! I am for Donald Trump now, and will be voting for him, come election day November, 2016.
Why? Because..he is a man not, of words, but action!!! All you vermin folks do is ponrtificate, yap, say nothing meaningful and kiss up to the likes of Obama & company, those that are working to destroy our American Republic...while you keep your cushy deals and status...and we, the people suffer, with each passing day!!!
Well, elite, ego maniacs...your little gig of ganging up on “the Donald” has failed miserably...and, you all look and are the stuck up, buttheads you really are!!! LMAO!!!
I can tell ya...just a gut feeling (and I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night), the GOP primary will go to the convention w/o a candidate having 1236 delegates.
I may change that opinion if candidates drop from the race, but as it stands, it is my belief the establishment wants to divvy up delegates to lock the process until convention time. Will see.
NR never attacked a Democrat like they just did Trump.
Says something doesn’t it.
Bingo!
What I see amongst that crew other than the ever lovely Dana Loesch is the same group more or less who killed Newt in 2011/12 and spoke out politically correct over my Confederate flag and have mostly opposed any immigration restrictions
Neocons pretty much pretending
I would note Rush and Hannity to their credit lament National Reviews action
It’s really eye opening how they cling to power and excuse it with earnestness
I don’t blame Pavlich either...she’s very young
If NR is so ineffectual, how can it have handed Trump the election?
Perhaps I have you wrong, but assuming you were also with Trump on the Cruz Birther issue, well according to Fox only 10 % said it would prevent them from voting for Cruz, just the lunatics.
A week from Monday can change everything, not that anything has changed even other than the MSM narrative that Trump has already won.
But the truth is there were 3 Iowa polls out 2 days ago, all on same day, yes CNN had Trump up 11, but as John King of CNN already pointed out, take the turn out methodology with a grain of salt, and added they also asked in the poll only those who actually showed up to caucus in Iowa 4 years ago, when they were asked same poll had Cruz up 2
2 other Iowa polls out same day
1 had Cruz up by 2, the other Trump by 1
the election is not over as you suggest.
Cruz wins Iowa and that`s the story, the NRO story is only a memory.
You are also forgetting that Trump is now being embraced by Bob Dole and washington establishment etc
I understand that does not fit your narrative.
A few of the people that are part of this coalition are strong conservative proponents who are very smart.
Even the most astute of Conservative Values people can be misled by an org like NR.
Hopefully these types will soon realize that the whole purpose of this gang of 22 is to knock out Trump, and then knock out their supposed favorite Cruz.
They are eGOP all the way, and would prefer Bush, or even The Rube (Rubio.)
In fact like most eGop’ers they would prefer that Clinton be President over either Trump or Cruz.
Rush pointed out the obvious the other day, same thing I and many other FR members have been saying for years.
That the eGOP don’t mind being the under-Party because it is less work and they still get their same perks-—and maybe on an elevated level as a reward for helping the dems push through their perverted leftist ruin-America-for-power and $ agenda.
If they manage to get Bush or Rubio as the republican nominee it will be made clear to which ever wins that they MUST make sure to fail so that Clinton can be elected.
Following in the footsteps of McCain and Romney who for the sake of the party and the wonderful reality that having a Black president is more important than the future of the USA and the freedoms of our citizens, they will do the same for Hillary.
<<< 22 self-appointed conservative potentates >>
I just called this out on another thread, considering two of the “conservative intellectuals” are Glenn Beck and his sidekick Dana Loesch, who until a few years ago was a self-admitted Democrat. When she was a Tea Party darling, she ran a site devoted to trashing Karl Rove! and just the other evening, confessed to MKelly that she is “not a Republican”.
Then, there’s Beck - an habitual hypochondriac who has claimed multiple times that he’s the target of secret agencies trying to take him down; and who was seeking organic healing advice from Don Imus’s liberal & idiotic wife.
These are two of the best NRO could convince to throw themselves under the bus.
Viva Cruz!
BAM!
This was really a sickening desperation attempt. He’s a national phenomenon, our best chance to win, on an incredible surge, and they’re trying to literally hand the election to Hillary or psycho Bernie.
I have my 14 year old son helping my neighbor (a Cruz delegate) on the Cruz campaign. I think it is good to be envolved in the process of electing our next our next president. I have been on the the fence with between Trump and Cruz, either would be great for different reasons. This article and who is on it has finally pushed me fully into the Trump camp. I still hope the best for Cruz and am still having my son work on his campaign but I think trump could actually put a stake in the heart of these “cheap labor” 5th columnists (pun intended). Ultimately I feel this primary is a chance to remove this very unconservative group of traitors to the US working man from my party. Go Trump! And if not him then Cruz!
BFL
BTTT
Trump, during his Red Socialist Period (2009): " I do agree with what they're doing with the banks. Whether they fund them or nationalize them, it doesn't matter, but you have to keep the banks going."
. . .what voters are looking for this year is competence and accomplishment.Once upon a time, in 1988, a certain Democratic candidate thought that's what the voters were looking for, too. How did that work out for Michael the Carcass? And why on earth are presumed Republican supporters of an aspiring Republican presidential candidate deploying antique Democratic talking points on his behalf? (Or are they admitting tacitly that yeah, we know he's a Democrat in all but name but let's not get technical about it, he's our Democrat in all but name?)
On the other hand, on another thread running down the National Review hoopla was a poster, a Trump supporter, saying, and I quote, "There's a time for heady debates about the Constitution. A Presidential campaign isn't one." (Could that be another tacit admission---an admission that in such a Constitutional debate, heady or otherwise, Mr. Trump would be buried alive, but quit talking about the Constitution, dummy, and start making America great again?)
Danger, Will Robinson . . .