Love this essay!
The tacky 22 attempted to undermine the American electoral process. They swooped in like a flash-mob, or like a gang of Muslim "refugees" surrounding a New Year's Eve "target" in Germany, or like a pack of cluster flies invading a residence. They are starting to learn that their sinister attempt to use a scattergun approach to subverting the will of the people has been thwarted and rejected by those real people.
hm, National Review has had a history of backing Republicans who eventually won the presidency Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan and both Bush’s. Romney was was the only candidate they backed which didn’t win.
NR backed Reagan when he ran against Ford in 1976.
NR’s endorsement may anger all in trumpsters but everyone else will see what the trump critics are writing and way the pro’s and cons.
Article written by a 5 year old?
Was this the Big Thing that we heard whispers about for months? The well planned,flawlessly executed effort that would finally bring down Mr Trump? Wow talk about having a high opinion of your own importance.
I want a mountain of things to get undone.
Thanks for posting this, and for the other links.
Go Trump!!
can someone list the 20 authors? Please?
Oh boy how true this is.
NR came out with an editorial 2 years ago backing Paul Ryan’s pension cuts to military veterans.......even combat, 100% disabled veterans who were missing limbs. I wrote them and told them what I thought of their position. They have lost perspective.
They’re the Omegas led by Greg Marmalard
Sadly, the only person that could take on both parties is TRUMP! There is no one else and that is SAD.
WOW!
Nail......meet Hammer!!!!!!!!
Blowback!
National Review: Publisher ‘Broken Hearted’ Over Subscription Cancellations
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3387393/posts
Glenn Beck, David Boaz, L. Brent Bozell III, Mona Charen, Ben Domenech, Erick Erickson, Steven F. Hayward, Mark Helprin, William Kristol, Yuval Levin, Dana Loesch, Andrew L. McCarthy, Michael Medved, Edwin Meese III, Russell Moore,
Michael B. Mukasey, Katie Pavlich, John Podhoretz, R. R. Reno, Thomas Sowell, Cal Thomas.
National Review’s version of Duke University’s infamous “Group of 88”; same same.
And why this is so important, is that leaning-GOP voters have been tuning in about the time of the first debate, which is about the same time in the last two elections that Democrats were busing low-info voters to early poll sites!
Trump is engaging people now. And he doesn't say, 'send me your money', or 'sign up for my campaign', just 'here's why you should vote for me'. It's a paradigm shift that has the Democrats and the GOPe and (a few too many FReepers) shitting their pants...
bump
Even more abuse of Breaking News sidebar.
National RINOview ceased being a conservative magazine years ago, and now all of a sudden their RINOS are espousing their “conservative” manifesto. Sorry folks, but your conservative credentials left the station long ago.