Speaking of trust... Ted’s senior strategist just had a disastrous interview with F. Chuck Todd on MTP Daily. Todd asked her four times to clarify what Ted wants to do about the upward of eleven million illegals already in the country.
The words she used never varied. They were— that he has been “consistant” on the issue, and would “deal with the border first”. Over and over, “consistant” and “deal with the border first”.
Four times. A non-answer.
She never answered or even remotely alluded to the point of the question. She never addressed it at all. Ted will not answer it. Still.
Todd went, afterward, to his two-person panel, who reported that the TRUMP ad that shows Brett Baier interviewing Ted is the closest to an answer Ted has ever given, and the panelist said she had asked Ted, herself, on four different occasions and could not get an answer.
Now, I don’t know how far down this road anyone wants to go, but what Ted is “consistent” is a form of amnesty, exactly as he proposed on video during his amendment push to get to a “pathway to legalization”.
How is that not AMNESTY? Why will he avoid what he stands for? Why does he say he is against AMNESTY, when like Rubio in MA, he lays a template for exactly that?
Anybody?
Just following the law as it stands would result in their deportation.